http://shipm-mod.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] shipm-mod.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] ship_manifesto2009-07-14 05:42 pm
Entry tags:

Poll for Part V reopened

Our latest poll has been re-opened. Sorry about the mix-up! It will remain open until 6 AM EST tomorrow to give those who missed out time to get their vote in.

We will be taking a short break once that poll has closed to sort out the votes from the last three polls. Socks socks everywhere! What turns out to be sock votes will be discarded and we'll announce our very first champions once we have a good handle on what to count and what not to count.

Thank you again for your votes!

[identity profile] haro.livejournal.com 2009-07-14 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm just curious as to how you decide what a sock account is? Because while I am not doubting your statement that sock accounts were used (seems like something that would happen), I'd like to know how you're making that decision.

[identity profile] enisy.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
Not hard to tell, when some of them have as obvious names as [livejournal.com profile] rockysockme, [livejournal.com profile] unfunfunfzutara, [livejournal.com profile] isocksummore, [livejournal.com profile] yeswecanbtches and [livejournal.com profile] hiothersockers. :P Also, I'm guessing accounts created on the day of the poll are prime candidates.

[identity profile] haro.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I'm sure some of them are very obvious, like the ones you pointed out. What I was more concerned about is situations like the one commented below, and how in my main fandom at least (and I'm sure others are the same), there are a lot of fans who only joined lj to look at locked posts and occasionally comment, so have no posts in their own and little to no content in their profiles/interests. Also, there are people whose only journal is their rp journal. And yeah, that's a couple of the reasons I asked for clarifications. Without that, it seems a bit of a slippery slope.

edit: LJ is eating my comments, so I apologize if you get this more than once.

[identity profile] ayasugi-san.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
Not a mod, but if I were, I'd use journal creation date as the major telltale. Most of the very obvious socks were created 7-13-09. Even an empty, keep-up-with-friends journal should have an older creation date than the day they voted in the poll.

[identity profile] haro.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, I definitely agree with that.

why look it's that RP account someone accidentally voted with

[identity profile] szasztastic.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
Well my concern is that they'll be looking to eliminate votes caused by people who voted with their regular journals, then went back and voted with their like 20 RP accounts or something.

Re: why look it's that RP account someone accidentally voted with

[identity profile] ayasugi-san.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 06:20 am (UTC)(link)
Again, not a mod, but that might be easy to spot, too; look for a large block of votes for the same pairing, check the userinfo to see if they're all RP accounts belonging to the same person. Doesn't help with people smart enough to space their RP-account votes out over several hours, but it would also spare most cases of "accidentally voted with RP journal instead of main" and "only have an RP journal".

[identity profile] mochalatt3.livejournal.com 2009-07-14 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd like to know too. What if you delete a vote from a real account?

[identity profile] kinosino.livejournal.com 2009-07-14 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Erm, would it be a good idea to revote on the poll where I accidentally voted with an RP account on the off chance it's discarded?

(Anonymous) 2009-07-15 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
Checking for sock accounts would be a good idea. In one of the comms I frequent there is this (http://community.livejournal.com/capslock_ulori/30376.html?nc=17) going on. I hope those who cheated by voting multiple times can fess up the names of their other accounts.

[identity profile] szasztastic.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
AH-HA

At the very least, it will be a moral victory for Haruka/Michiru! They don't need the Internet to prove their love anyway.

[identity profile] enisy.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 12:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm. I can see maybe one comment in that thread that could be stretched into "incriminating" evidence. I'm having some trouble taking the air of exasperation seriously, though, what with the anonymous post.

(Anonymous) 2009-07-15 12:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Says the hypocrite who voted multiple times. :P

[identity profile] enisy.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 12:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Mmhmm. I made multiple sock accounts and then informed the moderators that there were sock accounts being used. Because I'm smart like that. ;) Are you even a member of the aforementioned community, or do you "frequent" it for other, obvious reasons?

(Anonymous) 2009-07-15 12:29 pm (UTC)(link)
At least one comment was deleted from the post. I was expecting that. That's why I took screencaps.

Image
Image

[identity profile] enisy.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 12:39 pm (UTC)(link)
...LOL.

What I said in my previous comment? Still applies.

[identity profile] kawaiisdreal1.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 12:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Hehe, seriously anon, you're taking this thing way too seriously.

[identity profile] enisy.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 12:59 pm (UTC)(link)
GIP.

[identity profile] limepickles.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 01:46 pm (UTC)(link)
WHY ARE YOU TURNING AWAY FROM THIS MORAL OUTRAGE, YOUR INACTION IS SIMPLY ENDORSING THE EVIL ACT! WHEN GOOD PEOPLE DO NOTHING IT IS EVIL THAT PROSPERS!

THERE IS NOTHING TO ARGUE WITH, JUST LOOK THE PROOF IS RIGHT THERE IN BLACK AND WHITE, CLEAR AS CRYSTAL, I BET THEY EVEN STOLE FIZZY LIFTING DRINKS

(Anonymous) 2009-07-15 03:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow, chill. I'm a fan of the ship, okay? I just didn't think it was fair that some people voted multiple times.

[identity profile] limepickles.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 09:14 pm (UTC)(link)
huh, I thought you said you "frequented" capslock.

(Anonymous) 2009-07-15 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Um, yes. Fans of a ship "frequent" places of their ship, don't they? Apologies if my use of terminology confused people. I've ever had problems with others understanding me whenever I used the term.

And honestly I would have posted any evidence of cheating from other people from other comms if I had seen similar comments in other places. Why everyone is going crazy and accusing me of being a butt hurt shipper from an opposing ship is beyond me. :\ I just don't like unfairness, and as this post was about sock accounts I thought I could help out.

[identity profile] limepickles.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I understood you, I just find it odd that if you're familiar with the capslock community you'd think that was all super yelling rage instead of goofing around.

I think the reason people are reacting so much is cause you keep pushing it just a bit too far, is all. The first comment got a "LOL" but also one pretty straightforward reasonable reply, then you went and called them a hypocrite. That seems more like making things personal and accusatory than just trying to help out. Then you've even got screencaps that you prepared beforehand just in case, even your "wow, chill" seems like you're being obtuse on purpose.

What I'd honestly suggest is sending a private message to the moderators involved next time you want to help out or complain about unfairness. Because if you're NOT trying to stir up wank, the way you keep at it in these public posts is really giving the wrong impression and provoking people instead.

(Anonymous) 2009-07-15 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I love that comm. :) I never thought there was screaming rage there.

The hypocrite comment was made because that particular individual did vote using an old account of theirs. Someone had reported her yesterday.

Okay, I'll do that next time if this situation comes up again.

[identity profile] limepickles.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
WOOT, A ROUND OF CAPSLOCK FOR EVERYBODY, BARTENDER! AND ULQUIROLLS!
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] chuuni.livejournal.com 2009-07-16 11:28 am (UTC)(link)
Okay, I have to be fair about this.

Don't. Just. Don't. Please.

I know you're angry, but please don't make assumptions like that. This is asking for wank, you know.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] chuuni.livejournal.com 2009-07-16 11:36 am (UTC)(link)
Because accusing people without evidence is asking for wank.

I'm not scared, I'm merely asking you politely to control your temper because I consider you a fellow fan.

[identity profile] kalbim.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 01:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Yo anon, don't hide and show us who you are. Lovely anon <3

[identity profile] chuuni.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 03:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I am here to call back the Ulquihimes. Come on guys, we've been through this many times. You know better than to talk to strangers that run around naked.

In case any Haruka/Michiru fans are offended, I apologize. But we're probably not dealing with one of you here. So pardon us. :)

[identity profile] xglimpsex.livejournal.com 2009-07-16 05:19 am (UTC)(link)
Awww, but Hal, you know how we all love to run around naked!

[identity profile] chuuni.livejournal.com 2009-07-16 05:27 am (UTC)(link)
No I meant anon comments. They're not wearing their accounts, therefore they're running around naked :D

[identity profile] xglimpsex.livejournal.com 2009-07-16 05:28 am (UTC)(link)
Pfft.
Why do they get all the fun?
hahaha.

(Anonymous) 2009-07-15 01:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow, not the original anon but what's with all the UlquiHime's wanking in here? Posting anon too just cause you seem to love it so much.

[identity profile] enisy.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 02:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm sure you have other reasons, too.

At any rate, this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0V6HtdTtSw) should settle the argument.

[identity profile] kalbim.livejournal.com 2009-07-15 02:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow, not the original anon but what's with all the anti-UlquiHime's wanking in here? Posting anon too just cause I'm anti too and you know who I am and I don't want to give out my identity.


^ Fix'd for you.

(Anonymous) 2009-07-17 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
Guys, these polls aren't ~srs bsns~, but they are supposed to be fun. Don't contribute to all that negative stuff (like using sockpuppets/multiple accounts to cheat, trying to get other communities to vote against pairings, starting wank, and so on).